
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Rob Horton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hi, > > the other day I was pondering my methodology for creating new version > numbers for my embedded products. > It is very simple and is in the form A.B where A represents a big change and > B represents a small change. > > I got to wondering if there is a standard for version numbers. Does anyone > know of any? > > As an example, in Delphi, the version number is of the form A.B.C.D where: > > A = Major version > B = Minor Version > C = Release > D = Build > > So does that mean we can have different releases of the same version? But > then surely a different release will be a different version? > Should build be incremented each time a project is compiled? > > (please note, this isn't a Delphi specific question. I only used delphi as > an example.) > > What sort of system do "you" use? 1.2, where 1 is a big change, 2 is a small change. Big change means a release to customers, or major change to specifications or hardware. Small change is used to keep track of versions during debugging.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |