
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryan Bullard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >"Chris Hills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >sorry, i seldom see standard c programs that do any real work. most are >full of platform specific types, inline compiler, link, or source control >commands, inline assembler, etc. Exactly. This is why a standard is not the best thing to learn a language from. >also, many c compilers have an option to allow k&r syntax. Not these days. Remember K&R 1st ed is 30 years old and K&R 2nd ed is C90 >in a perfect world, all c code would conform to the latest ISO. assuming C99 is perfect (opening another can of worms in his asbestos suit) >actually, in a perfect world we probably would not be writing programs in c. >:) FORTH! There, I've said it before one of the Priests of old FORTH (poof :-) says it... >however, you do make a good point that the k&r book is probably not a good >transition text from assembler languages to c. the authors of the book >disliked assembler and actually developed c so that they wouldn't have to >use their assemblers. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.phaedsys.org \/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |