
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bryan Bullard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >"Chris Hills" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >chris, > >i can respectfully acknowledge you're point of view. however, i and many >others believe the k&r book is still valid for learning simply because all >the concepts are plainly stated and explained. it is an easily and quickly >digestible text. > >also, i will remind you that off all the c code out there a relatively small >percentage of it adheres to C90+. Most adheres to C90+ Some now almost C99. Certainly all the compilers are somewhere between C95 and C99. Many of the things in K&R are not permitted in many coding standards etc. There are also many better books for learning C especially fro some one coming from an assembly background to embedded c. I have seen the effect of a K&R taught programmer coming to grips with an embedded project... wanted to use sdterr and printf to hard disk for debugging on an 8-bit smart card.... /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/\ /\/\/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.phaedsys.org \/\/ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |