Re: Atmel Atmega48

"Ulf Samuelsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> > From the manufacturing point of view it seems a bit odd to have
> > two almost identical chips. My guess is that in the long run
> > '8 will disappear. The case is similar to 2313 <-> tiny2313,
> 
> No it ain't,
> If one of your major customers wantsit, he getsit.

Ok. So, what are the reasons for _not_ migrating from '8L to '88?
I do understand that some industries require certified code which
must not be ported or changed any way, and this will quite effectively
dictate the use of the older part. But apart from this? Price?
Pin-incompatibility? Something missing?

TIA,

- Ville

-- 
Ville Voipio, Dr.Tech., M.Sc. (EE)