
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Ralph Mason wrote: > > "Jim Granville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Ian McBride wrote: > > > > > > I have heard that Atmel has a 32-bit AVR-like architecture (not ARM) in > > > development, near release. Is this true? > > > > Anything is possible, but this makes little commercial sense : > > > > - They have an ARM product line already, this would canabalise that.. > > ARM own's arm, so they pay a fee for each chip > Customers can 'jump' ship to another ARM processor. > AVR customers may be thinking of using an ARM (I know I am) and ATMEL > doesn't have anything that looks good to me. But something like a beefed up > AVR and they may hang on to those customers. Correct, but those same customers then have to choose between 'Green Silicon/Single Source' OR Proven family/Multisourced. Look at Motorola's MCORE phase-out as an example of just how hard even the biggest player finds hitting 'critical mass' on a new 32 bit core. -jg
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |