Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The Question Type



uru means feelings.  

it is conceptual, representations, which means by feelings, but are feelings
definable?

[From Theorisation Morality by Gilbert Cockton]
Anything can be defined by a man, perhaps not described.

No, not.

[From Theorisation Morality by Gilbert Cockton]
However, if we do discover a complete theory oit should in time be
understandable by everyone, not just a few scientists, then we shall all find
the question of why it is that we and the universe exist discussable.

Determinism is surreal - or is it (that was Stephenâs essayâ)?  We decide
on what we believe and say is a moral theory about life and on who we are
beings towards.  What we show matters to us as we can see by the si, co, and te
curves through the way they interact through time.  If a man remembers a theory
he can then say it to his friend.  Can we begin to treat evolution as a subject
for education rather than for a culture war?  Can we begin to take it
seriously, to learn about Charles Darwinâs Theory of Evolution and other
peopleâs Theory of Evolution.  I would build my life around the same
principles as those that made the world.  The American applied mathematician
Claude Elwood Shannon, born in Gaylord, Michigan, in 1916 on April the 30th,
developed (1948) a mathematical theory of communication that was later called
information theory.  He defined information as the degree of freedom the
information source has in choosing among elements of a language in order to
compose a given message that is a matimatical formula.  This work, of
fundamental importance in problems of communication, opened new paths of
research in mathematics.  Shannon received his Ph.D. from the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) in 1940.  After working (1941-57) at the Bell
Telephone Laboratories, he served (1958-80) as Donner professor of science at
MIT.  

1)      The theorisation moralty of a man is understood by distinguishing
sanely between what is assumed by the morality of a theorisation and what is
assummed by the manâs theorisation moralty.  

2)      Understand the terms of the theorisation moralty used by the theorist
completely and precisely.  Evolution is a term with many facets and their
meanings may have a way of changing without notice.  Macroevolution is
macroevolution and microevolution is microevolution.  Macroevolution is the
process that creates gravitations, planes, staves and waves, as well as comples
organs or new body parts called miroevolutive macroevolution.  Microevolution
is cyclical variation within the type.  We must not be impressed with claims
that in a few borderline cases microevolution may have produced, or almost
produced, new "speciesâ because microevolution cannot occur outwith
macroevolution.  Darwinists claim that macroevolution is just microevolution
continued over a very long time is evil for us and most harmful to our natures.
 





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.