
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<Bouh> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:12:15 GMT, "Glen M. Sizemore" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >GS: The fact that you can alter behavior profoundly by direct manipulation > >of nervous tissue, pharmacologically or otherwise, has no bearing on my > >argument. None whatsoever. There is no question that the brain, in some > >sense, mediates behavior. What is at issue is whether or not the metaphors > >of cognitive "science" are the best concepts to use, and whether or not > >there is any way to inquire about the utility of concepts. Experiment does > >not do it, because the concepts are NOT theories or hypotheses; they are > >what underlies theories and hypotheses. They are what we are talking about > >when we say that scientists have "underlying philosophies." But this issue > >is far too subtle for the likes of you. > > Are you trying to tell that behaviorism is better ? His brain is not sure what is better; he makes assertions without showing: 1) How the current state of affairs is damaged by what is current practice 2) How his approach would lead to greater strides. 3) Evidence of those greater strides > > > Pat
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |