
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 02:12:15 GMT, "Glen M. Sizemore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >GS: The fact that you can alter behavior profoundly by direct manipulation >of nervous tissue, pharmacologically or otherwise, has no bearing on my >argument. None whatsoever. There is no question that the brain, in some >sense, mediates behavior. What is at issue is whether or not the metaphors >of cognitive "science" are the best concepts to use, and whether or not >there is any way to inquire about the utility of concepts. Experiment does >not do it, because the concepts are NOT theories or hypotheses; they are >what underlies theories and hypotheses. They are what we are talking about >when we say that scientists have "underlying philosophies." But this issue >is far too subtle for the likes of you. Are you trying to tell that behaviorism is better ? Pat
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |