
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eray Ozkural exa) writes: >Neil W Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eray Ozkural exa) writes: >> >I think paradoxes are illusions much in the same way a visual illusion >> >occurs. The logical reasoning faculty expects a certain kind of input >> >and it tries to make a computation, in particular an inference which >> >will satisfy the question of whether a useful logical conclusion >> >exists given these premises. >> What is this "logical reasoning faculty"? >> I don't see any evidence that there is such a faculty. >Well, maybe you keep your observations to your own thoughts ;) It has always seemed to me that ordinary reasoning is not logic based. >Seriously, I think we can compute inferences in propositional logic at >least. It perhaps doesn't come in logical sentences and wffs like >logicians would prefer, but it seems to me logic nonetheless! Well sure. However, most people find propositional logic quite difficult, or at least they find it unnatural.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |