
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Neil W Rickert says... >When I first came across the liar paradox (as a child), I found it >amusing. It never seemed puzzling. It never seemed that there was >anything that had to be solved. Well nothing ever *has* to be solved, but by definition, a paradox consists of a sequence of reasoning steps that *appear* to be valid, but which lead to a nonsensical or contradictory conclusion. The puzzle is to figure which step or steps was invalid. -- Daryl McCullough Ithaca, NY
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |