Re: Creativity

OmegaZero2003 wrote:
> "Jim Balter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Lester Zick wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:16:25 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> > > comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > Lester Zick wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:52:26 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> > > > > comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > People might begin to think you're an idiot.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Which I freely admit for conversing with you. Anyone with an inability
> > > > > to comprehend the meaning of is and is not is either a Democrat or
> > > > > currently repeating sixth grade. Same difference I guess. AMF.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently you are a Limbaugh dittohead, the lowest form of idiot.
> > > > Clinton's distinction was between "is" and "was", between
> > > > the present and pluperfect tenses of "is".  But idiots aren't
> > > > able to comprehend such distinctions.
> > >
> > >
> > > Apparently not in your case.
> >
> > Indeed, if idiocy is a matter of being able to comprehend distinctions,
> > then we should all be idiots.
>
>
> If honesty is a matter of being able to tell the whole truth under oath,
> then we should all be honest.

We should all be honest in the normal sense of the word.

> Unfortunately, Clinton would not be in that group.

True but irrelevant.

> Where is Osama - ask Bill!

He's no longer president, moron.

--
<J Q B>