Re: Creativity

"Jim Balter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Lester Zick wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:16:25 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> > comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Lester Zick wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:52:26 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> >>>comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>>People might begin to think you're an idiot.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Which I freely admit for conversing with you. Anyone with an inability
> >>>to comprehend the meaning of is and is not is either a Democrat or
> >>>currently repeating sixth grade. Same difference I guess. AMF.
> >>
> >>Apparently you are a Limbaugh dittohead, the lowest form of idiot.
> >>Clinton's distinction was between "is" and "was", between
> >>the present and pluperfect tenses of "is".  But idiots aren't
> >>able to comprehend such distinctions.
> >
> >
> > Apparently not in your case.
>
> Indeed, if idiocy is a matter of being able to comprehend distinctions,
> then we should all be idiots.

If honesty is a matter of being able to tell the whole truth under oath,
then we should all be honest.
Unfortunately, Clinton would not be in that group.

Where is Osama - ask Bill!


>
> -- 
> <J Q B>
>