Re: Creativity

Lester Zick wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 13:16:25 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>
>
> > Lester Zick wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:52:26 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
> > > comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>
>
> > > > People might begin to think you're an idiot.
> > >
> > >
> > > Which I freely admit for conversing with you. Anyone with an inability
> > > to comprehend the meaning of is and is not is either a Democrat or
> > > currently repeating sixth grade. Same difference I guess. AMF.
> >
> > Apparently you are a Limbaugh dittohead, the lowest form of idiot.
> > Clinton's distinction was between "is" and "was", between
> > the present and pluperfect tenses of "is".  But idiots aren't
> > able to comprehend such distinctions.
>
>
> Apparently not in your case.

Indeed, if idiocy is a matter of being able to comprehend distinctions,
then we should all be idiots.

--
<J Q B>