Re: Creativity

On 28 Nov 2003 21:02:21 GMT, Neil W Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
comp.ai.philosophy wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lester Zick) writes:
>>On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 11:52:26 -0800, Jim Balter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in
>>comp.ai.philosophy wrote:
>
>>>> People might
>>>> begin to think you're a Democrat.
>
>>>People might begin to think you're an idiot.
>
>>Which I freely admit for conversing with you. Anyone with an inability
>>to comprehend the meaning of is and is not is either a Democrat or
>>currently repeating sixth grade. Same difference I guess. AMF.
>
>Perhaps you are saying that Democrats are smart enough to understand
>that meanings depend on context, and particularly so for a word such
>as "is" which has a broad range of usage.  And perhaps you are saying
>that Republicans are all so stupid as to have a simplistic view of
>meanings which casts them as being fixed independent of context.
>
>Indeed, I have met a lot of intelligent Democrats and a lot of
>stupid Republicans.
>
>However, I have also met a lot of intelligent Republicans and a lot
>of stupid Democrats, so I think things are not as you would portray
>them.

No, no. I don't have much more use for Republicans than Democrats. I
just have the least use for those don't know what the meaning of is
is.
>



Regards - Lester