Re: A troubling paradox...

Fred Mailhot wrote:
> On 11/25/03 11:27 PM, "Jim Balter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > The argument *is* an argument against physicalism.  It is attributed to
> > Jackson, but apparently Thomas Nagel gave a similar argument in 1974;
> > see "Historical Background" in
> > http://host.uniroma3.it/progetti/kant/field/ka.html
>
>
> Is the Nagel argument from the "What it's Like..." paper ?

Did you follow the link?  That's what it says.

--
<J Q B>