
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daryl McCullough) writes: >Neil W Rickert says... >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daryl McCullough) writes: >>>The modern foundation for thermodynamics is statistical mechanics. >>>Statistical mechanics defines entropy in terms of information, and >>>defines temperature in terms of entropy. >>It is my impression that the entropy from information theory is >>different from the entropy from thermodynamics. They are analogous, >>in that they satisfy the same mathematical equations. But they are >>different things. >Yes, but there is a common idea connecting them: in both cases, >entropy quantifies the relationship between gross (statistical) >knowledge of a system state and detailed knowledge. In both cases, >the entropy is the expected number of bits of information required >to specify the details given the gross knowledge. I don't have any problems with that. I tend to think that the Shannon concept of information is the wrong one for cognitive science. /dev/random supplies entropy, but you won't be much informed by reading its output.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |