
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"rick++" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (Suspiciously like a midterm question ...) > But I'd like to add the question, "Is creatively a useful or necessary > component of intelligence"? Useful no doubt. Necessary - probably not. Intelligence, remember, has many facets/aspects - creativity beingone. Also, measures of intelligence writ large, or of any of the aspects are not binary; the vallues fall on a spectrum - a range. Therefor, one can have zero creativity, but be highly measured in othr aspects. I would not want to say that one must have *all* the aspects of intelligence to be considered intelligent. > > You do need to generate new trial solutions to solve problems. > A more creative intelligence could solve the problem faster > being more creative. > > A more creative intelligence would be more interesting to communicate > with than a less creative one.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |