
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jose M. Castro) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > I built a recursive training process that calculates the total error > for all the points to predict (simple sum of square of errors) and > store the weights in a text file, then go for a new training (allways > using the same training pairs), if this give less error then replace > the weights file, if not then go for a new training. 1. I hope you are using an independent validation set to calculate the error. 2. If not, do you add a weight penalty term to SSE? 3. Are initial weights and biases the only difference between these runs? > At training 654 > the program stops for insuficient memory, (I think I should clean > memory for each training but don't know how to do this in visual > basic). I've got better results than those obtained with the non > linear regresion of the Excel's solver (half the error of this). I hope Excel's statistical routines are better than they used to be. Again, beware of comparing design data error rates. > Now it is time to add a new recursive loop to change the number of > hidden nodes and run the above process for every network arquitecture, > graph the results and see what we got. > Thanks for the feedback What benchmark data sets are you using? Good Luck. Greg
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |