Re: Logic And Politics #6: Introducing Computational Marxism

"Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > > Introducing Computational Marxism: The Art Of Losing
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > LEAPS!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What long winded nonsence, how the hell did you write all this
>  drivel?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You know, I used to feel that way about computational linguistics
>  too,
> > > > > > but there's really something to it.
> > > > >
> > > > > You mean other than bilking tons of research money from useful
>  research
>  and
> > > > > squandering it on a waste of space.
> > > >
> > > > Well, if you want to talk about bilking tons of research money I'm an
> > > > interested but not a knowledgeable party; and the results of academic
> > > > computational linguistics to date are none too impressive.  But my
> > > > point here is that "punching while rap" may be an inescapable reality
> > > > of meaning (both in the sense of constituting some fragment of meaning
> > > > in all cases and all meaning in some cases), and although I'm no great
> > > > admirer of Lenin this is actually the tendency of the *Philosophical
> > > > Notebooks*.  That's I how I wrote all this "drive-vel", and I am
> > > > putting more in than I'm used to (though contentful criticism would be
> > > > appreciated).
> > >
> > > Are you an Ai programme? I mean I hear they write pointless nonsence
>  that in
> > > no way relates to what they person is writing.
> >
> > It is time for you to stop all of your sobbing.
> 
> Yep, you aren't real

Indeed I am not, that's why you don't want to step to me with Turing
Machines.  (Untyped lambda calculi, on the other hand, are equal to
any task!)