Re: Logic And Politics #6: Introducing Computational Marxism

"Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Introducing Computational Marxism: The Art Of Losing
> > > > > >
> > > > > > LEAPS!
> > > > > >
> > > > > What long winded nonsence, how the hell did you write all this
>  drivel?
> > > >
> > > > You know, I used to feel that way about computational linguistics too,
> > > > but there's really something to it.
> > >
> > > You mean other than bilking tons of research money from useful research
>  and
> > > squandering it on a waste of space.
> >
> > Well, if you want to talk about bilking tons of research money I'm an
> > interested but not a knowledgeable party; and the results of academic
> > computational linguistics to date are none too impressive.  But my
> > point here is that "punching while rap" may be an inescapable reality
> > of meaning (both in the sense of constituting some fragment of meaning
> > in all cases and all meaning in some cases), and although I'm no great
> > admirer of Lenin this is actually the tendency of the *Philosophical
> > Notebooks*.  That's I how I wrote all this "drive-vel", and I am
> > putting more in than I'm used to (though contentful criticism would be
> > appreciated).
> 
> Are you an Ai programme? I mean I hear they write pointless nonsence that in
> no way relates to what they person is writing.

It is time for you to stop all of your sobbing.