
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Niki Estner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Can anyone explain me (or point me to information that does) why [NLP] is > such a hard topic? > Is the number of rules simply too big??? Depends on whose rules. I argue that one can model language with a fairly small set of grammatical rules, plus heavy reliance on semantics and habit. > Can syntax not be analyzed without semantics? Right, and semantics implies world knowledge and the processing power to handle it. -- Tom Breton at panix.com, username tehom. http://www.panix.com/~tehom
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |