Re: Logic And Politics #6: Introducing Computational Marxism

"Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > "Stuart Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >  news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > > > "Jeff Rubard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Introducing Computational Marxism: The Art Of Losing
> > > > >
> > > > > LEAPS!
> > > > >
> > > > What long winded nonsence, how the hell did you write all this
drivel?
> > >
> > > You know, I used to feel that way about computational linguistics too,
> > > but there's really something to it.
> >
> > You mean other than bilking tons of research money from useful research
and
> > squandering it on a waste of space.
>
> Well, if you want to talk about bilking tons of research money I'm an
> interested but not a knowledgeable party; and the results of academic
> computational linguistics to date are none too impressive.  But my
> point here is that "punching while rap" may be an inescapable reality
> of meaning (both in the sense of constituting some fragment of meaning
> in all cases and all meaning in some cases), and although I'm no great
> admirer of Lenin this is actually the tendency of the *Philosophical
> Notebooks*.  That's I how I wrote all this "drive-vel", and I am
> putting more in than I'm used to (though contentful criticism would be
> appreciated).

Are you an Ai programme? I mean I hear they write pointless nonsence that in
no way relates to what they person is writing.