Re: cognitive != observable? (project three)

Neil W Rickert wrote:
> Patty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> > Perhaps I should emphasize more that the stratagy is to 
> > create a platform on which we can *start* evolving.  Even a 
> > baby does not know its references when it *starts* to babble.
>
>
> Very much the point.
>
> I got into this area at precisely that point -- how does a baby (or
> any organism) make sense of the bloomin' buzzin' confusion of signals
> and establish reference?
>
> I believe I have solved the problem.  But it turns out that
> practically nobody is in the least bit interested.  It seems that
> almost everybody take reference for granted, and sees me as not
> having solved any problem at all.

Well I am very interested in it.  Could you sketch the 
solution here, or is it already on the web?

Patty