
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: cognitive != observable?
- __From__: dan michaels
- __Subject__: Re: cognitive != observable?
- __Date__: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 23:48:11 -0500
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Acme Posting) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> 1. Google count of ritual words and site promotions (8,000+ total).
> 2. Intensional/folk psychological language problem only when people
> disagree with him, not when they agree.
> 3. No converts to his dogma in 8 years.
It might actually be interesting to know if anyone [outside of GS] has
actually "not" been attacked by him - in the ritual sense.
- Re: cognitive != observable?, (continued)
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Acme Posting
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Glen M. Sizemore
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
dan michaels
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Kent Paul Dolan
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
David Longley
- Re: cognitive != observable?,
Glen M. Sizemore