
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Comp Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention
- __From__: Neil W Rickert
- __Subject__: Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention
- __Date__: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 20:30:11 -0500
David Longley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Neil W
>Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eray Ozkural exa) writes:
>>When one talks about semantic properties, one is usually attempting
>>to do some sort of logical analysis of natural language expression
>>in terms of those semantic properties.
>>What I am suggesting, is that this methodology is a poor fit, and
>>will never work very well.
>Are you going to tell him why?
The evidence that it doesn't fit should be obvious. Roughly
speaking, that's why natural language processing is so difficult.
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention, (continued)
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
David Longley
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
David Longley
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
David Longley
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
David Longley
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Neil W Rickert
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Patty
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Eray Ozkural exa
- Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention,
Patty