Re: Folk Psychology and Social Convention

Neil W Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eray Ozkural  exa) writes:
> 
> >So, could you give an example for a robot that has semantics but not
> >only on the basis of syntax (ie. motor planning)? Do you mean
> >something like physical properties (material, tension, etc.) being a
> >necessary condition for a certain semantic property irreducible to the
> >abstract specification of the robot?
> 
> Really, it is more complex than that.  The word "semantics" doesn't
> fit very well what it aims to describe.

What is more complex than "a semantic property irreducible to the
abstract specification of the robot"? Since you never told me, I
cannot know what you have in mind. Please explain.

Regards,

--
Eray Ozkural