
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
David Longley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > http://www.behavior.org/journals_BP/2000/Place.pdf > > There is quite a large literature on social conformity which could be > referred to, but whilst of some heuristic value (in the helpful, > illustrative sense) I really find that social psychological literature > relatively trivial compared to the rather detailed and powerful work > which has been done for decades in what I rather loosely refer to in > this newsgroup as "behaviour analysis" and "learning theory". Thanks, you've only reminded us of this 1000 times so far. I really find that very conforming to hear again. Longley Citation Statistics [8 long years and counting] ------------------------------------------------------- folk psychology [derogatorily] in over 1000 posts Quine [glowingly] in over 1800 posts silly [regarding others' ideas] over 400 times Skinner [in awe] in over 800 posts behaviorism [as accepted dogma] in over 500 posts [pernicious] mentalism over 100 times [pernicious] cognitivism over 250 times intensional [as wrongish] over 1600 times extensional [as correctish] over 1850 times frag.html [self-promotion] over 300 times
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |