
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
What knowledge should supposed? It is understandable to suggest that hitting some monster with fire arrows to no effect might suggest changing weapons. But should that knowledge be presupposed? IF so, then you wouldn't want to shoot at it in the first place. But what is the implication of presupposed knowledge? What about the next time you encounter a similar beast? Behaps the fire arrow immunitity was imparted not by a trait of the creature but a protective spell. The second encounter might not have such a protection and fire arrows might be the most effective tool to dispose of the threat.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.