
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"baylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > So, the point being, an ANN starts in learning mode, at which point it > doesn't actually do anything but learn (i.e., it doesn't make > decisions) and then ends up in usability mode, at which point it has > learned all it will ever learn and never adjusts again Which brings up a point: Is it possible for such networks to continue learning? Does the word Traditional apply to these algorithms? Is the decision to cut off learning a necessary threshold point? I'm wondering if perhaps the off-line learning model was created to conserve cpu cycles, a resource that has climbed by orders of magnitude over the past decade. I seem to recall that Learning is opposite Memorization; a balance between flexibility and rigid precision. What if we let the system continue to learn? It is my guess that such a system would 'forget' old information as new information continued to update the weights, which seems to mirror nature.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.