
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
This sounds like a project I have been working on. We developed a fuzzy procedure to classify the benthic impacts of fish farming (Angel et al. 1998) and then used a neural network to analyse the evaluations of the experts to create a fuzzy expert system (Silvert and Baptist 2000). The procedure was to provide a team of experts with data, they evaluated the data and produced the classification - we then fed the original data and the expert conclusions into an NN to see if we could construct a black box that would generate the same classification scheme. Unfortunately we did not really have enough samples to construct a reliable NN, although the results were promising. This is a common problem with the use of NN in ecological situations, but I think the basic idea of feeding both raw data and expert evaluations of those data into a neural network is promising. References below. Bill Silvert Dror Angel, Peter Krost and William Silvert. 1998. Describing benthic impacts of fish farming with fuzzy sets: theoretical background and analytical methods. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 14: 1-8. William Silvert and Martin Baptist. 2000. Can Neuronal Networks be used in Data-Poor Situations? Presented at Int. Workshop on Applications of Artificial Neural Networks to Ecological Modelling, Toulouse, France, 14-17 Dec. 1998. In: S. Lek & J.-F. Guégan (Eds.), Artificial Neuronal Networks; Application to Ecology and Evolution. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 241-248. "William Siler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dmitry A. Kazakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > I would not set off NN against expert systems. Because it is > > theoretically possible to build an expert system on the basis of a NN. > > Consider "experts", which knowledge can be extracted in the form a > > neuronal subnetwork. Then this knowledge, a description of a network, > > is incorporated into a larger system using some standard framework. > > That would be a NN-based expert system. > > This is a new idea to me, and is very interesting. The idea of looking > at a neural net that has been conventionally constructed (from a > training data set) as a fuzzy expert system, and extracting the rules > from the resulting neural net, is of course not new; we seem to agree > that this work has not been very satisfactory. But the idea of looking > at a fuzzy expert system that has been constructed from expert > knowledge rather than a training data set is new to me, and strikes me > as being fairly important. > > Of course, real-world fuzzy expert systems are a lot more complicated > than simple one-step fuzzy control expert systems. The expert systems > I have constructed ten to be multi-step affairs, with the rules > fireable in one step being fired in parallel, and the results of one > step being fed as input to the next step. I think you mean that we > could look at each epert system step as a layer in a neural net. > > We frequently have recursion, with the outputs being fed back as > inputs to steps that have already been fired. Has anyone worked with > neural nets in which the outputs of one layer are fed back as inputs > to the same or a preceding layer? > > Sincerely, William Siler
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.