Re: is communication a requirement to collaborate?

"Anthony Bucci" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is body language a form of communication? Or indirectly, seeing a dog
wag
> > his tail as his master emerges from the store? And furthermore, does it
seem
> > that these events communicate something to everyone who observes them? A
> > one-to-many relationship.

Ed:
People signs we call also a language. And if you can believe in evolution
you know as well before we could talk we use hand, head, shoulders and more
for signals. Do you remember that time?

But a one-to many relationship, In a real brain? Have you ever seen a real
brain with spiking neurons?

And in the brain a cluster of neurons that work for body signals and for
speech and writing both. They are called with a strange name transition
neurons.

It's an economic way of nature to use the same neurons for different
outputs.

Anthony:
> That's all well and good. But a bit is a bit is a bit. If a computer
> gets a digitized image of a dog -- just bits. If a computer receives a
> digitized command from you -- just bits. It's all just bits.

Yes exactly. look in the detail that is exact,.

> Why is one
> "seeing" and the other "hearing," beyond satisfying your desire to
> anthropomorphize?

Exactly Anthony.

We mathematicians can make fantastic products and they surely function, but
what has that do to with our own brain, and why is that necessary?

I see it so, it works, fine, and what is then important.

>
> The storytelling is useful for intuitive leverage, maybe. But otherwise
> -- what good is it? That's what I'm asking.
>
> As if I haven't polluted c.a.p. with enough of my babbling, I'm
> crossposting this there, too. It feels relevant.
>
> Anthony
>

Thanks for this posting, Anthony. You look wider than most posters.

And I certainly like that

Ed