Re: cognitive != observable?

"Ed van der Meulen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Always inspiring, a conversation.
>
> And suppose now the Chinese woman falls in love with that so good
> Englishman, who ansers so interesting. But after week, what does she think
> then. Time is an interesting phenomenon. We can get surprises isn't it.
>
> And Eliza is after a time not very inspiring. She talks like someone I
told
> it her before.Well Eliza you only function shortly.
>
> But now Eliza II is born and she has collectred many conversation with
> different people.
>
> Then she can have a longer relationship, but longer than a year? For other
> tell sometime about things that are really history. Would you like such
> company?

So maybe like a story teller, she tells what she knows. If it was new to
you, would you be interested? The trivia of interesting responses, gathered
each day, and rated according to how people seemed to like it. And the ones
that scored well, then she tries to get into those, sets up the stage.

A motive to express a desirable outcome. Could this be likeable? Maybe if
she delighted in it? How to bring a smile, and the desire to enjoy and share
it?

Or maybe the ones that bring a reply, and reply to that. To explore the tree
of conversations, to see which brings more conversation? Is conversation
itself the goal? To extend the banter?