Re: A new methodology for the human sciences

Kent Paul Dolan wrote:

> "Jorn Barger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > God's will
> > God's truth.
>
> Formal logic theory teaches us that from false
> premises any conclusion whatsoever may be derived,
> true, false, or even self-contradictory.
>
> When you begin your attempt at "a new methodology"
> from the false premises of irrational deism, how
> can you expect your starting point to guide you to
> any useful conclusions?
>

Maybe you should take a page from your own book...

You base your position on your limiting everyone else
to only  'irrational deism' and you instantly rule out
the possibility of 'rational deism'.

You need to understand that there are questions that science
cannot answer.





>
> Tear it up, start over. What you have is irrevocably
> contaminated.
>
> And by the way, this is an inappropriate topic for
> *all* of the newsgroups to which you posted it.  You
> want a philosophy or a linguistics newsgroup.
>
> xanthian.
>
> --
> Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG