
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"reg-john" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > probably said the same thing about the go betweens. except youre right, > something for kate is just shit. so were the go-betweens. what a load of over-hyped crap they were. > > "Shadowking" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > > > Article there : > > > http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/23/1069522462411.html > > > > > > > Boring. SFK aren't worth all this hype. They aren't underground and they > > don't have this mainstream commercial potential either (unless they do a > > forced metamorphosis of some sort) - but i doubt that will work either. > > > > They are an average indie band with limited mainstream crossover appeal > > ala- powderfinger 1996 > > > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |